🔗 Share this article

Protesters gathered outside the legislative building this week

Latvia's lawmakers have decided to withdraw from an international accord designed to protect females from abuse, including family violence, following prolonged and heated debates in the legislature.

Thousands of demonstrators assembled in the capital this week to voice disagreement with the decision. The ultimate decision now lies with Head of State the nation's president, who must determine whether to endorse or veto the legislation.

Known as the Istanbul Convention, the international accord only became active in the Baltic state last twelve months ago, mandating governments to establish laws and assistance programs to eliminate all types of violence.

Latvia has become the initial EU country to initiate the procedure of withdrawing from the convention. Turkey withdrew in two years ago, a decision that rights groups characterized as a significant regression for gender equality.

Political Debate and Resistance

The international agreement was approved by the European Union in last year, yet conservative groups have argued that its focus on equal rights weakens traditional families and promotes what they term "non-traditional gender concepts".

Following a thirteen-hour discussion in the Latvian parliament, MPs voted 56 to 32 to withdraw from the convention, a move sponsored by opposition parties but backed by politicians from one of the three governing partners.

The outcome represents a setback for moderate conservative government leader the nation's PM, who stood with demonstrators outside the legislature earlier this seven-day period. "We refuse to give up, we will persist in our struggle so that abuse will not prevail," she declared to the assembly.

Ideological Divisions and Responses

One of the main political groups supporting the withdrawal is Latvia First, whose leader has urged citizens to choose between what he terms a "traditional family unit" and "gender ideology with multiple sexes".

Latvia's ombudswoman Karina Palkova urged the treaty not to be politicized, while the organization Equality Now asserted it was "not a danger to Latvian values, it served as a tool to achieve them".

The recent decision has sparked widespread outcry both within the country and internationally.

22,000 people have endorsed a Latvian petition demanding the treaty to be preserved. The gender equality group Centrs Marta has called a demonstration for next Thursday, accusing MPs of disregarding the will of the nation's citizens.

Global Worries and Possible Next Steps

The leader of the European organization's legislative body stated that Latvia had made a hasty choice fueled by misinformation. He described it as an "never-before-seen and deeply concerning step backward for female equality and human rights in the continent".

He added that since Turkey abandoned the treaty in 2021, instances of gender-based killings and violence against women had increased significantly.

Because the vote did not secure a two-thirds majority, the head of state could possibly return the bill for additional review if he has concerns.

Head of State the national leader announced on digital platforms that he would assess the decision according to legal principles, "taking into account state and legal factors, rather than belief-based viewpoints".

Recently, another component of the governing alliance, the Progressives, suggested it would not exclude appealing to the supreme judicial body.

"This decision represents a concerning development for gender equality not only in Latvia but across the continent," commented a rights activist.

• Family violence statistics have been increasing in several European countries
• The European treaty mandates specific legal protections for survivors of domestic abuse
• The nation's decision could affect similar discussions in other member states