🔗 Share this article

When the Russian President traveled to the South Asian nation in the previous decade, the international order was markedly different. That short trip, limited by the pandemic, focused on discussions on strategic and defense cooperation between the two nations.

Months later, the large-scale military offensive of Ukraine would transform the Russian leader into a figure of international condemnation, greatly limiting his diplomatic travel.

Additionally, that period preceded a significant shift in US-India relations, marked by inflammatory rhetoric and the introduction of substantial trade tariffs.

"Against this backdrop, the significance of Putin's journey to engage with the Indian PM is profound, serving as a symbol of enduring ties and a defiance of external pressure," experts emphasize.

A Critical Juncture for Two Major Powers

The summit occurs at a delicate moment. The Kremlin leader arrives following dismissing recent diplomatic initiatives for Ukraine, confident due to claimed gains by Russian forces.

"For Russia, the primary importance of this visit is its simple happening," stated a prominent analyst based in Moscow. "It suggests a movement toward something resembling normal international relations."

For India, the stakes are particularly elevated. The country navigates a challenging geopolitical climate, characterized by a semi-isolationist United States, a weakened Russia, and an increasingly powerful China.

The tightrope walk was highlighted just before the visit, when European ambassadors published a public commentary criticizing Russia's commitment to peace. This prompted a sharp rebuke from Indian officials, who called it an inappropriate diplomatic practice.

'China Remains the Greatest Threat'

The historical partnership dates back to the Soviet period and remains firmly rooted, with Moscow long being Delhi's primary arms provider. This relationship was generally accepted by the West before a change in approach.

For years, Western nations overlooked India's substantial purchases of cheap energy from Russia. However, in the wake of failed peace efforts, accusations mounted, leading to economic penalties and a major chill in US-India ties.

"Consequently, India has reverted to its traditional posture of maintaining multiple options," explained a strategic analyst. "It signals to the US that it has alternatives and is waiting to see how the situation unfolds."

Apart from global diplomacy, India's core motivation with Russia is its strategic location. "China continues to be the primary security challenge to India, and for decades, India has relied on Russia as a continental balancer against China," the analyst added.

The strengthening partnership between Russia and China has caused concern in Delhi, prompting efforts to avoid an unbreakable bond between its adversary and its longtime partner.

This concern has also accelerated India's drive to diversify its military imports, decreasing its reliance on Russian equipment from about 70% to under 40% in the past few years.

"India will attempt to find a middle ground: purchase enough Russian arms to keep the partnership alive, but avoid so dependent that a sudden cutoff would leave it vulnerable," the analyst remarked.

The Oil Question

Enhanced trade relations is likely to be a major topic. The Russian leader has recently emphasized plans to take cooperation with India to a "qualitatively new level", defying Western sanctions.

The matter of energy imports is pivotal. While the Indian government has stated to continue buying Russian oil, new sanctions have slowed activity from the commercial buyers. Simultaneously, India has agreed to increase imports of US energy.

A Russian official acknowledged "obstacles" in energy trade but insisted it would continue without major disruption. The official minimized the impact of sanctions, claiming they would cause only "insignificant" and "temporary" disruptions and that Russia possesses the "means" to bypass such measures.

Limited Leverage on Ukraine

When the two leaders sit down, the issue of Ukraine is expected to be mentioned mainly through India's standard call for a peaceful resolution.

"Yes, Prime Minister Modi can speak to both sides, India lacks the diplomatic clout to alter the course of the conflict," the analyst said. "Aside from urging negotiations, its ability to make a difference is limited."

Ultimately, notwithstanding the public displays of camaraderie between the two leaders, the partnership is at its core one of "pragmatic strategic interest," guided by cold calculation in a volatile world.